Entries Tagged as ''

OCC Concerned about Agreement between NY-AG, OFHEO, Fannie and Freddie

In a letter to the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has expressed ”substantial concerns” regarding certain appraisal related agreements and a code of conduct agreed to by OFHEO, the Attorney General of the State of New York, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The OCC’s concerns relate to unintended adverse consequences of the Agreements and Code for the safety, soundness and efficient operation of national banks’ residential mortgage lending activities and the cost of credit to consumers.

The OCC says that it “strongly endorses” the principle that appraisers must be free from coercion or influence.  This objective should be achieved, however, through direct regulation.  The goal should not be sought indirectly by dictating the corporate and internal organizational structures of lenders.

The OCC then goes on to say that the Agreements and Code conflict with the approach set forth by Congress and have “significant, unintended negative consequences for lenders and borrowers, and . . . major legal flaws.”

The OCC provides its rationale and objections at length in the 12-page letter.

For a full copy of the letter, click here.

SBA Head (Proposed New HUD Chief) Suggests RESPA Reform Workable

Inman News reports that Steve Preston, Administrator of the Small Business Administration, testified before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs that many of the objections the SBA had with HUD’s prior RESPA Reform effort have been addressed.

Inman notes that the 2002 Reform effort occurred before Mr. Preston assumed his position at the SBA.  The SBA’s chief counsel of advocacy said at the time, however, that the then proposed changes would adversely affect “mortgage brokers, mortgage lenders, Realtors, appraisers, pest inspectors and settlement services providers.”  The comment also indicated HUD’s initial analysis did not adequately take into consideration comments by small businesses affected, or develop less burdensome alternatives.

In March 2004, a number of members of Congress sent a letter to HUD with similar complaints.  HUD later withdrew the proposed rule.  The SBA’s counsel then commended HUD’s decision to withdraw.

Inman quotes Preston as testifying:

“I don’t know that I’ve got a detailed enough notion to understand exactly what that reform should look like,” Preston said at Thursday’s hearing. “But I do think it’s important for individuals when they come to a closing process to understand what they’re getting into, and for there to be clarity in that, and I’m hopeful that that can be done in a way that’s not overly burdensome to the industry.”

For a copy of the full Inman article, click here.

 

 

OCC Addresses Home Equity Loan Losses

Comptroller of the Currency, John C. Dugan, recently addressed significant problems banks were encountering with home equity loans and lines of credit. 

Mr. Dugan indicated that the accelerating losses in this sector showed banks need to build reserves and return to stronger underwriting.

Mr. Dugan noted that home equity loans and lines of credit more than doubled sinc 2002, to $1.1 trillion.  The increase was, at least In part, because of rapid appreciation in home prices, tax deductibility, and low interest rates.  But the increase also came, he said, from weak underwriting.

The consequences, Mr. Dugan noted, were that house price declines beginning in 2007 have caused unprecedented losses.  Losses have traditionally run at about 20 basis points (2/10 of 1 percent).  In 4th quarter 2007, however, losses were at nearly 1 percent.  In 1st quarter 2008, losses were at 1.73 percent.

In perspective, losses were still far lower than other types of retail credit, such as credit cards.  But prompt and determined action are necessary, including building sufficient reserves and strengthening underwriting.

Among the practices that need particular scrutiny, Mr. Dugan highlighted:

  • The use of home equity lines to finance down payments.
  • The appropriate use of collateral valuation tools, such as asset valuation models, which the Comptroller said must be closely managed, periodically validated, and supported with sound business rules.
  • Income documentation. Although the overt use of stated income has been largely abandoned, some lenders now ask for income information and authorization to verify it, but do not follow through. “This practice is only marginally better than expressly relying on stated income, since it is questionable whether the borrower’s belief that income will actually be verified will really induce a higher level of honesty in providing information,” Mr. Dugan said. “We need to think carefully about whether anything short of actual verification of income is acceptable from a safety and soundness perspective for most borrowers.”
  • The extended interest-only structure that home equity credit lines have in the early years of the loan term. Payment patterns can only be a proxy for a borrower’s capacity to handle a given debt level if he or she is asked to make payments that are meaningful. “Interest-only payments reflect a borrower’s capacity to pay interest on a debt, but not the debt itself,” Mr. Dugan said. “Further, this lack of structured payment discipline encourages borrowers to assume greater levels of debt, often to the limit of their ability to make minimum monthly payments. In contrast, higher payments that reduce principal address both these concerns.”

For a copy of Mr. Dugan’s prepared remarks, click here.

For a copy of the OCC’s press release, click here.

 

 

 

 

HUD Guidance on Non-Approved Reverse Brokers

The Department of Housing and Urban Development has issued Mortgagee Letter 08-14 (Home Equity Conversion Mortgage Program - Non-FHA Approved Mortgage Brokers)

ML 08-14 purports to be a reminder to FHA-approved lenders of:

FHA’s policy regarding the use of non FHA-approved mortgage brokers, subsequently referred to as a non-approved entity or third party (i.e., advisor, consultant, mortgage broker) to support the origination of FHA-insured Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECM).  Loan origination must be performed by FHA approved entities which include: (1) an FHA-approved loan correspondent and sponsor; (2) an FHA-approved mortgagee through its retail channel; or (3) an FHA-approved mortgagee working with another FHA-approved mortgagee.  However, FHA policy permits a non-approved entity or third party to assist in the origination of insured loans in certain limited ways, and to receive compensation for such services actually provided under certain limited circumstances.

This Mortgagee Letter describes the ways in which a non-approved entity or third party may support the origination of HECMs and the limited circumstances under which they may be compensated, consistent with both applicable FHA policy and applicable requirements of the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and its implementing regulations found at 24 CFR Part 3500.

FHA-approved entities are required to complete the full origination process, as described below, in order to be compensated for their services.  A non-approved entity or third party may provide more limited services only and be compensated for those limited services under the circumstances described in this Mortgagee Letter and applicable FHA and RESPA regulations.  FHA will not permit an FHA-approved entity to serve in the limited capacity of a non-approved entity or third party.

ML 08-14 then goes on to discuss required activities for the FHA-approved entities, certain activities in which non-approved entities can engage and compensation to such non-approved entities.

For a full copy of ML 08-14, please click here.

House Committee Praises Senate Committee Bill

The U.S. House Committee on Financial Services has released the following statement regarding the passage by the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs:

I congratulate Senator Dodd for the passage of legislation through the Banking Committee that will help stem the significant rise in foreclosures in America.  Senator Dodd deserves a great deal of praise for getting this bill through the committee by such a significant vote.  Because of his leadership on this issue, and the cooperation of Senator Shelby, it is highly likely we will be able to compromise on a significant housing package.   There are of course some differences between the two bills and we will need to work on these differences, but I look forward to continued cooperation between members of the House and the Senate to achieve a mutually agreed housing package sometime next month.

There seems to be a growing consensus that the Senate, and perhaps the Administration, may find a way to compromise on legislation soon.

Stay tuned . . .

 

FTC Issues Final Rules on CANSPAM

The Federal Trade Commission has issued final rules under the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003. 

The FTC had proposed rules on May 12, 2005, and requested public comments. 

The final rule includes a substantial preamble, in which the FTC addresses issues raised by various commenters on the initial proposal. 

The Table of Contents for the final rules is as follows:

PART 316--CAN-SPAM RULE
Sec.316.1 Scope.
316.2 Definitions.
316.3 Primary purpose.
316.4 Requirement to place warning labels on commercial
electronic mail that contains sexually oriented material.
316.5 Prohibition on charging a fee or imposing other
requirements on recipients who wish to opt out.
316.6 Severability.

The preamble gives significant insight to the agency’s analysis.  For a copy of the preamble and complete final rule, please click here.

For a somewhat older general summary from the FTC of requirements and penalties under the CANSPAM Act, please click here.

FTC and Fed Propose Risk Based Pricing Rules

The Federal Trade Commission and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve have proposed new risk-based pricing rules under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003.  

According to the agencies’ joint summary, the new rules:

generally require a creditor to provide a risk-based pricing notice to a consumer when the creditor uses a consumer report to grant or extend credit to the consumer on material terms that are materially less favorable than the most favorable terms available to a substantial proportion of consumers from or through that creditor. The proposed rules also provide for two alternative means by which creditors can determine when they are offering credit on material terms that are materially less favorable. The proposed rules also include certain exceptions to the general rule, including exceptions for creditors that provide a consumer with a disclosure of the consumer’s credit score in conjunction with additional information that provides context for the credit score disclosure.

Comments are due August 18, 2008.

For a copy of the Federal Register notice, please click here.

HUD Official Posts Op-Ed Article

Brian D. Montgomery, the Assistant Secretary for Housing, Federal Housing Administration Commissioner, of the Department of Housing and Urban Development recently responded to characterizations that Congress’s retooling of FHA would be a “magic bullet.”  Mr. Montgomery also chided Congress’s alleged failure to send the President a bill “dedicated to reducing foreclosures and preventing this mess from happening again.” 

Mr. Montgomery’s article reads:

Your May 11 editorial, “Bigger role for FHA,” leaves readers thinking congressional legislation to address unease in the housing market is a magic bullet when, in fact, the House-passed proposal is financially irresponsible and does more harm than good.

Last fall, the administration implemented a sound plan to help struggling families stay in their homes without placing taxpayers at risk. Homeowners who are in the right house with the wrong mortgage are now refinancing into FHA-backed loans and are working with their lenders to write-down their mortgages.

On the other hand, the House-approved proposal recklessly rewards financially risky behavior by letting homeowners refinance into the government-backed program regardless of whether they missed the majority of their monthly payments and have bad credit.

The Congressional Budget Office says the risky House plan would cost $1.7 billion, help a lot less homeowners than originally predicted, and would force responsible taxpayers to foot that bill.

Our targeted approach has helped nearly 200,000 families avoid foreclosure since last year and will assist 500,000 homeowners by year’s end. Despite the urgency and our two-year call for meaningful legislation to reform the FHA, Congress has yet to send the president legislation truly dedicated to reducing foreclosures and preventing this mess from happening again. That’s what is shameful.

For a copy of the article, click here.

 

OCC Guidance on Avoiding Foreclosure Scams

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has issued guidance on how consumers can avoid foreclosure rescue scams.

The OCC’s press release states:

Most foreclosure rescue scams fall within three categories.  In lease-back or repurchase scams, the con artist convinces a borrower to sign over their deed in return for a promise to lease back or eventually repurchase the property.  Refinance fraud involves a situation where the borrower believes the transaction is a refinance, but in fact the fraud involves transfer of property ownership to the con artist.  Bankruptcy schemes involve repeat bankruptcy filings to get a temporary stay order to delay foreclosure, but can result in damaging the consumers’ credit without saving their homes.

The OCC lists some ways to identify scams, ways to avoid them, and ways to seek actual assistance when facing difficulties in making payments.

For a copy of the full press release, click here.

For a copy of the Consumer Advisory, click here.

HUD Issues Guidance on Reverse Mortgages

The Department of Housing and Urban Development has issued Mortgagee Letter 2008-12 regarding counseling fees under the Federal Housing Administration’s reverse mortgage program - Home Equity Conversion Mortgages.

ML 2008-12 states in part:

In accordance with the regulations at 24 CFR 214.313, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) has determined that agencies participating in HUD’s Housing Counseling Program may charge a fee for HECM counseling services as long as the cost is reasonable and customary, does not create a financial hardship for the client, and meets the other requirements of the regulation.  The housing counseling agency must make a determination about a client’s ability to pay, which should include factors, including, but not limited to, income and debt obligations.  HUD recommends that the housing counseling agency have written procedures in place for determining ability to pay. Such procedures should support that a determination is based on objective criteria, and not a subjective determination.  The counseling file of each client charged fees should include documentation demonstrating that the cost does not create a financial hardship

Agencies must inform clients of the fee structure in advance of providing services. A client must not be turned away because of an inability to pay.  Moreover, the housing counseling agency may not withhold counseling or the Certificate of HECM Counseling based on failure to pay.

HUD also addresses the amount of appropriate charges for the counseling fee, charges for counseling of related parties, and manner of payment.

For a full copy of the ML 2008-12, please click here.